Claims

Doing nothing at school was the least positively rated activity for students with visual impairments

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Among activities across contexts, doing nothing at school received the least positive enjoyment ratings. → Jessup 2018

Evidence

Jessup 2018

Jessup, G; Bundy, AC; Broom, A; Hancock, N. (2018). Fitting in or feeling excluded: The experiences of high school students with visual impairments. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200305

q3 · i? · associational · r1

In the experience-sampling comparison of activity enjoyment across contexts, the study reports that "Doing nothing at school was the least positively rated activity." The authors call the social impact of this an imperative for staff to ensure lesson participation.

"Doing nothing at school was the least positively rated activity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id doing-nothing-at-school-least-positive
title Doing nothing at school was the least positively rated activity for students with visual impairments
description Doing nothing at school was the least positively rated activity for students with visual impairments
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jessup-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.