Claims

The effect of drama on social studies achievement does not differ significantly by duration of application (1–4 vs 5–10 weeks)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Between-group homogeneity testing showed no statistically significant difference in effect sizes between studies lasting 1–4 weeks (d = 0.906) and 5–10 weeks (d = 1.222) (QB=2.429 < X2=3.841; p=0.119). → Yildirim 2022

Evidence

Yildirim 2022

Yildirim, E., Tikman, F., & Senturk, M. (2022). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of using the drama approach in social studies course. International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), 4(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.301

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis comparing 13 studies of 1–4 weeks (d = 0.906, moderate) with 25 studies of 5–10 weeks (d = 1.222, strong). The between-group test found "no statistically significant difference between the groups", so achievement did not change by duration.

"Since the homogeneity value of QB=2.429, calculated in this study, was smaller than the accepted critical value of 3.841 (QB=2.429.05), it could be assumed that there was no statistically significant difference between the groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.