Adults with developmental dyslexia use arithmetic fact retrieval less frequently than matched controls during single-digit multiplication and subtraction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Adults with dyslexia showed significantly less frequent retrieval use than matched controls across single-digit multiplication and subtraction. → Bert De Smedt 2010
Evidence¶
Bert De Smedt 2010¶
Bert De Smedt, Bart Boets. (2010). Phonological processing and arithmetic fact retrieval: Evidence from developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3973–3981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.10.018
q3 · i3 · associational · r2
Strategy-frequency ANOVA (2 operations × 2 groups) in a matched-groups study of 25 university students with dyslexia and 25 controls, with trial-by-trial verbal strategy reports on 28 problems per operation. The group main effect on retrieval frequency was significant, ηp² = .19; the Operation × Group interaction was not significant (F(1, 47) = 2.18, p = .15).
"There was also a main effect of group (F(1, 47) = 11.26, p < .01, /DC1p2 = .19), with participants with dyslexia showing significantly less frequent retrieval use."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Simple subtraction in adults relies heavily on strategy use, which disadvantages participants under limited working memory resources — related
- Adults with DD rely on time-consuming back-up strategies like finger usage for single-digit arithmetic, with prolonged response latencies that appear number-specific — related
- Adults with developmental dyslexia are slower than controls at speeded digit identification
- Adults with dyslexia execute both retrieval and procedural arithmetic strategies more slowly than controls
- The association between phonological awareness and fact retrieval is prominent in multiplication but largely absent in subtraction at the subgroup level
- Adults use a mix of retrieval and procedural strategies in single-digit arithmetic, with retrieval more frequent in multiplication and procedures more frequent in subtraction — a broader claim this one bears on
- Adults with dyslexia are slower than controls on single-digit arithmetic, with a larger multiplication-minus-subtraction reaction-time difference, even after controlling digit identification speed — related
- Working memory demand increases with the complexity of arithmetic and math problems, including operand size and number of solution steps — related
- Phonological awareness is uniquely associated with multiplication fact retrieval frequency, in both dyslexia and control groups — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dyslexia-reduced-arithmetic-fact-retrieval-frequency |
title |
Adults with developmental dyslexia use arithmetic fact retrieval less frequently than matched controls during single-digit multiplication and subtraction |
description |
Adults with developmental dyslexia use arithmetic fact retrieval less frequently than matched controls during single-digit multiplication and subtraction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bert-de-smedt-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.