Claims

Educational programmes are associated with significant improvements in nurses' diabetic foot care practice, measured in seven of the nine included studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Studies measuring practice outcomes reported consistent, statistically significant improvements in foot inspection, neurovascular assessment and related domains. → Al‐Me'ani Mohammad 2026

Evidence

Al‐Me'ani Mohammad 2026

Al‐Me'ani Mohammad, Alqaisi Omar, Dibas Mohammed, Al‐Aaraj Heyam, Rubbai Yousef. (2026). Effectiveness of Educational Programmes on Knowledge and Practice Related to Diabetic Foot Care Among Nurses: A Systematic Review. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.70324

q3 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis of the seven studies measuring practice outcomes; the review reports practice moved from "unacceptable before training" to acceptable after a NICE-protocol-based intervention (Likert means from <2.5 to ≥2.5). No pooled effect size was calculated.

"Studies measuring practice outcomes also reported consistent and significant improvements. Buloala [17] showed that the practice of foot inspection, palpation, footwear assessment and evaluation of patients' capacity for self‐care was unacceptable before training"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.