Claims

An interactive workshop produced higher post-test knowledge scores than an e-learning course of equivalent content among nurses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Both e-learning and interactive workshop formats improved diabetic foot care knowledge, but post-test scores were significantly higher in the interactive workshop group. → Al‐Me'ani Mohammad 2026

Evidence

Al‐Me'ani Mohammad 2026

Al‐Me'ani Mohammad, Alqaisi Omar, Dibas Mohammed, Al‐Aaraj Heyam, Rubbai Yousef. (2026). Effectiveness of Educational Programmes on Knowledge and Practice Related to Diabetic Foot Care Among Nurses: A Systematic Review. Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1002/edm2.70324

q2 · i? · review · r3

Single quasi-experimental two-group pre-post study among 80 nurses (40 per format) comparing a five-module e-learning course with a face-to-face interactive workshop of equivalent content; the review attributes this to Aalaa et al. [19]. No effect size printed.

"Both formats produced statistically significant post‐intervention improvements in diabetic foot care knowledge (p < 0.01); however, post‐test scores were higher in the interactive workshop group than in the e‐learning group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.