Embedding items has the potential to be a more equitable measure of reading comprehension for marginalized groups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The embedded format has potential to be more equitable by removing measurement barriers, particularly for students with disabilities, memory-load difficulties, English language learners, and test anxiety. → Guerreiro 2022
Evidence¶
Guerreiro 2022¶
Guerreiro, M., & Johnson, J. (2022). Measuring student reading comprehension performance: Considerations of accuracy, equity, and engagement by embedding comprehension items within reading passages. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 27. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/measuring-student-reading-comprehension-performance-considerations-of-accuracy-equity-and-engagement-by-embedding-comprehension-items-within-reading-passages/
q2 · i? · causal · r?
The article states the embedded approach "has the potential to become a more equitable measurement of reading comprehension by removing barriers to measurement," naming students with disabilities, English language learners, and test anxiety as groups that may benefit; the available text reports no subgroup effect sizes.
"This approach also has the potential to become a more equitable measurement of reading comprehension by removing barriers to measurement, particularly for marginalized groups (e.g., students with disabilities, memory-load difficulties, English language learners, test anxiety)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Classroom reading comprehension practice differs from formal assessment in item placement relative to the passage — related
- Embedded-item passages may yield improved student reading comprehension scores and a more valid measurement approach — related
- Traditional end-of-passage assessment formats may inadvertently measure extraneous constructs such as working memory, attention, and language — related
- Embedding comprehension items within reading passages significantly affects measured reading achievement compared with answering items at the end of the passage — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
embedded-items-potential-equity-marginalized-groups |
title |
Embedding items has the potential to be a more equitable measure of reading comprehension for marginalized groups |
description |
Embedding items has the potential to be a more equitable measure of reading comprehension for marginalized groups |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — guerreiro-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.