Claims

Traditional end-of-passage assessment formats may inadvertently measure extraneous constructs such as working memory, attention, and language

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Prompting students to answer items at the conclusion of a reading passage may introduce measurement of extraneous constructs. → Guerreiro 2022

Evidence

Guerreiro 2022

Guerreiro, M., & Johnson, J. (2022). Measuring student reading comprehension performance: Considerations of accuracy, equity, and engagement by embedding comprehension items within reading passages. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 27. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/measuring-student-reading-comprehension-performance-considerations-of-accuracy-equity-and-engagement-by-embedding-comprehension-items-within-reading-passages/

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The article proposes that end-of-passage formats introduce extraneous memory and attention demands, stating assessments "may inadvertently measure extraneous constructs (e.g., working memory, attention, language, reading ability)"; this is an interpretive claim rather than a directly tested result in the available text.

"The study suggests that assessments may inadvertently measure extraneous constructs (e.g., working memory, attention, language, reading ability) by prompting students to answer items at the conclusion of the reading passage."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id end-of-passage-format-measures-extraneous-constructs
title Traditional end-of-passage assessment formats may inadvertently measure extraneous constructs such as working memory, attention, and language
description Traditional end-of-passage assessment formats may inadvertently measure extraneous constructs such as working memory, attention, and language
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — guerreiro-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.