Embedding comprehension items within reading passages significantly affects measured reading achievement compared with answering items at the end of the passage¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Asking items throughout the passage had a significant impact on the measurement of student achievement relative to end-of-passage items. → Guerreiro 2022

Evidence¶

Guerreiro 2022¶

Guerreiro, M., & Johnson, J. (2022). Measuring student reading comprehension performance: Considerations of accuracy, equity, and engagement by embedding comprehension items within reading passages. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 27. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/measuring-student-reading-comprehension-performance-considerations-of-accuracy-equity-and-engagement-by-embedding-comprehension-items-within-reading-passages/

q2 · i? · causal · r?

The study compared embedded-item passages with traditional end-of-passage item placement and found "a significant impact of embedding comprehension items within reading passages on the measurement of student achievement"; no effect size is printed in the available text.

"Results showed a significant impact of embedding comprehension items within reading passages on the measurement of student achievement in comparison to answering items at the end of the passage."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Classroom reading comprehension practice differs from formal assessment in item placement relative to the passage — related
• Embedded-item passages may yield improved student reading comprehension scores and a more valid measurement approach — related
• Embedding items has the potential to be a more equitable measure of reading comprehension for marginalized groups — related
• Traditional end-of-passage assessment formats may inadvertently measure extraneous constructs such as working memory, attention, and language — related