Most EMME experiments that measured immediate learning scores reported at least one positive effect of gaze visualization on immediate learning¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Of experiments measuring immediate learning scores, 41 (52.56%) reported a positive effect of EMME, 4 (5.13%) a negative effect, and 13 (16.67%) no effect. → Emhardt 2023

Evidence¶

Emhardt 2023¶

Emhardt, S. N., Kok, E., van Gog, T., Brandt-Gruwel, S., van Marlen, T., & Jarodzka, H. (2023). Visualizing a Task Performer's Gaze to Foster Observers' Performance and Learning—a Systematic Literature Review on Eye Movement Modeling Examples. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09731-7

q2 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review synthesis of 78 experiments coded by the authors; Table 5 reports that for immediate learning score, 41 experiments (52.56%) found a positive effect, 4 (5.13%) negative, and 13 (16.67%) no effect, with "20 (25.64%)" not investigating this outcome.

"Immediate learning score 41 (52.56%) 4 (5.13%) 13 (16.67%) 20 (25.64%)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• EMME study designs vary widely: most experiments added information, used dynamic scan-path visualizations, and over half did not report how eye movement data were processed — related
• Gaze outcome measures showed the highest relative rates of positive EMME effects among the outcome categories reviewed — related
• Prior knowledge may moderate EMME effectiveness, but support for novices benefiting more is inconsistent across studies — related
• Rationales for using EMME differ systematically by task domain: sports studies emphasize quiet-eye strategy, medical studies strategy plus attention guidance, and STEM studies more often social mechanisms — related