Greater time and effort invested in the task correlate with better integration and smaller calibration error¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Across the whole sample, integration of information correlated positively with processing time (r = .46) and response length (r = .63), and negatively with calibration error (r = − .81). → Lucia Mason 2022
Evidence¶
Lucia Mason 2022¶
Lucia Mason, Christian Tarchi, Angelica Ronconi, Lucia Manzione, Natalia Latini, Ivar Bråten. (2022). Do medium and Context Matter when learning from multiple complementary Digital texts and videos? Instructional Science (2022) 50:653–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09591-8
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
Zero-order correlational analysis on the full sample (descriptive statistics in Table 1). The authors interpret that "participants who invested more time and effort in the task were also more likely to gain more integrated understanding and be better calibrated"; these are correlational, not causal, findings.
"integration of information was correlated positively with both processing time (r = .46, p < .01) and response length ( r = .63, p < .01), and negatively with calibration error (r = − .81, p < .01)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Reading comprehension uniquely adjusted behavioral engagement, with better comprehenders investing more time and writing longer responses — related
- Invested mental effort and perceived task difficulty are significantly positively correlated at all measurement points except MP2.5, with correlations increasing as material complexity rises — related
- The relationship between invested mental effort and self-assessed understanding is weak and inconsistent, with most correlations non-significant and mixed directions — related
- Perceived task difficulty correlates negatively with self-assessed understanding and with interest at essentially all measurement points, while interest and self-assessed understanding correlate positively throughout — related
- Pairwise relationships between invested mental effort, perceived task difficulty, interest, and self-assessed understanding fluctuate across measurement points, with most correlations stronger when more content knowledge is presented — related
- Invested mental effort and perceived task difficulty are strongly correlated yet relate differently to relative task difficulty, indicating the two ratings measure different aspects of overall cognitive load — related
- University students spent longer processing time watching two complementary videos than reading two complementary digital texts — related
- No significant medium, context, or interaction effects on integration of information across complementary texts or videos — related
- Longer eye fixation time is ambiguous between processing difficulty and extra processing effort, so eye movement data should be validated with outcome measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
engagement-correlates-integration-calibration |
title |
Greater time and effort invested in the task correlate with better integration and smaller calibration error |
description |
Greater time and effort invested in the task correlate with better integration and smaller calibration error |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lucia-mason-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.