Reading comprehension uniquely adjusted behavioral engagement, with better comprehenders investing more time and writing longer responses¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 As a covariate, reading comprehension uniquely adjusted processing time (η²p = 0.036) and response length (η²p = 0.039), indicating better comprehenders were more engaged. → Lucia Mason 2022
Evidence¶
Lucia Mason 2022¶
Lucia Mason, Christian Tarchi, Angelica Ronconi, Lucia Manzione, Natalia Latini, Ivar Bråten. (2022). Do medium and Context Matter when learning from multiple complementary Digital texts and videos? Instructional Science (2022) 50:653–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09591-8
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Covariate effects within the ANCOVAs on behavioral engagement for the 255 participants. Reading comprehension also uniquely adjusted processing time, F(1, 240) = 9.05, p = .003, η²p = 0.036, and task value for videos adjusted processing time, F(1, 240) = 5.95, p = .015, η²p = 0.024.
"The covariate of reading comprehension uniquely adjusted response length, F(1, 245) = 9.99, p = .002, η2 p = 0.039, indicating that better comprehenders were more likely to write longer responses."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Greater time and effort invested in the task correlate with better integration and smaller calibration error — related
- The comprehension-skill difference in inference making persists after controlling for memory for the text and delayed retention of the knowledge base — related
- No significant medium, context, or medium-by-context effects on written response length as a measure of behavioral engagement — related
- Both the course and the assistant increase behavioral engagement, measured as characters written per journaling prompt — related
- University students spent longer processing time watching two complementary videos than reading two complementary digital texts — related
- No significant medium, context, or interaction effects on integration of information across complementary texts or videos — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
reading-comprehension-adjusts-engagement |
title |
Reading comprehension uniquely adjusted behavioral engagement, with better comprehenders investing more time and writing longer responses |
description |
Reading comprehension uniquely adjusted behavioral engagement, with better comprehenders investing more time and writing longer responses |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lucia-mason-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.