Student engagement fully mediates the relationships between lecturer charismatic leadership/technology use and learning performance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Direct paths from charismatic leadership and technology use to learning performance are non-significant, while indirect paths through engagement are significant, indicating full mediation. → Hazzam 2023
Evidence¶
Hazzam 2023¶
Hazzam, J., & Wilkins, S. (2023). The influences of lecturer charismatic leadership and technology use on student online engagement, learning performance, and satisfaction. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104809
q3 · i? · associational · r2
SEM bootstrap mediation analysis (AMOS); indirect effects significant, e.g., technology use → learning performance indirect path .25 (p = .004) with non-significant direct path .09 (p = .120).
"Table 5 indicates that the direct relationships between lecturer charismatic leadership, lecturer technology use and student learning performance are not significant. However, the indirect relationships are significant. Thus, student engagement fully mediates the relationships between lecturer charismatic leadership and learning performance and lecturer technology use and learning performance."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In a cross-sectional survey analysed with SEM, self-efficacy's direct path to learning engagement was non-significant, and its association with engagement ran indirectly through self-regulation, teaching presence and cognitive presence (statistical mediation, which cannot show cause) — related
- Student self-efficacy moderates the relationship between lecturer charismatic leadership and behavioral engagement, with stronger effects for lower self-efficacy students — related
- Lecturer charismatic leadership is positively related to student online cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement — related
- Teacher confidence fully mediates the relationship between institutional support and attitudes toward AI adoption — related
- Family satisfaction fully mediates the relationship between school-family balance and life satisfaction among student parents — related
- Teaching presence was positively related to cognitive presence but had no direct relationship with learning engagement; cognitive presence fully mediated the teaching presence–engagement relationship — related
- In a cross-sectional model, attention problems relate to both non-verbal and verbal math performance only indirectly, through working memory (and, for MR, reading) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.