Claims

Student engagement fully mediates the relationships between lecturer charismatic leadership/technology use and learning performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Direct paths from charismatic leadership and technology use to learning performance are non-significant, while indirect paths through engagement are significant, indicating full mediation. → Hazzam 2023

Evidence

Hazzam 2023

Hazzam, J., & Wilkins, S. (2023). The influences of lecturer charismatic leadership and technology use on student online engagement, learning performance, and satisfaction. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104809

q3 · i? · associational · r2

SEM bootstrap mediation analysis (AMOS); indirect effects significant, e.g., technology use → learning performance indirect path .25 (p = .004) with non-significant direct path .09 (p = .120).

"Table 5 indicates that the direct relationships between lecturer charismatic leadership, lecturer technology use and student learning performance are not significant. However, the indirect relationships are significant. Thus, student engagement fully mediates the relationships between lecturer charismatic leadership and learning performance and lecturer technology use and learning performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.