Included ethics-of-teaching instruments show acceptable-to-excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.74–0.97) and supported structural validity¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Internal consistency across individual studies ranged from acceptable to excellent, with Cronbach's α between 0.74 and 0.97. → Chaimo Kesinee 2026 q3 i? Structural validity was supported for the EEQ, TEPI, TCPERSS, and MCI with acceptable to strong model fit indices. → Chaimo Kesinee 2026

Evidence¶

Chaimo Kesinee 2026¶

Chaimo Kesinee, Thanasilp Sureeporn. (2026). Psychometric properties of instruments assessing the ethics of teaching: a COSMIN-based systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2026.23.12

q3 · i? · review · r2

Synthesis of psychometric findings across the 6 included instrument-validation studies, summarized in Table 6. The review reports internal consistency "ranged from acceptable to excellent (Cronbach’s α =0.74–0.97)" and structural validity supported for four named instruments.

"Internal consistency estimates across individual studies ranged from acceptable to excellent (Cronbach’s α =0.74–0.97). Structural validity was supported for the EEQ, TEPI, TCPERSS, and MCI, with acceptable to strong model fit indices."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Questionnaire constructs showed acceptable to strong internal consistency (α = 0.740 to 0.945) — related
• The GAA-LS shows satisfactory-to-strong internal consistency and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity — related
• The MAKQ dimensions show acceptable internal consistency across both studies (alphas 0.77-0.93) — related
• No existing ethics-of-teaching instrument was developed specifically for health professions education — related
• A COSMIN-based systematic review identified 6 instruments assessing the ethics of teaching from 246 records — related