Claims

Questionnaire constructs showed acceptable to strong internal consistency (α = 0.740 to 0.945)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.740 for skill transfer to 0.945 for institutional collaboration, with all core learning-process constructs exceeding 0.70. → Shen 2026

Evidence

Shen 2026

Shen, N., Lee, L. S., and He, A. (2026). Generative AI in creative education: baseline-linked evidence on learning processes, artistic performance, and authorship. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1956939

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Internal-structure analysis of the study's questionnaire (Table 2) reports alphas for ten multi-item constructs; support was 0.814, creative experience 0.911, aesthetic judgment 0.902, skill transfer 0.740, and agency 0.781. The article states the values "supporttheuseofthequestionnairemeasures."

"Cronbach'sα values ranged from 0.740 for skill transfer to 0.945 for institutional collaboration."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id questionnaire-constructs-internal-consistency
title Questionnaire constructs showed acceptable to strong internal consistency (α = 0.740 to 0.945)
description Questionnaire constructs showed acceptable to strong internal consistency (α = 0.740 to 0.945)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — shen-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.