Claims

Even students who do not view handsets as useful report being more likely to participate in classes where handsets are used

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 71% of students neutral about handset usefulness and 57% of those rating handsets not useful still indicated at least a 50% likelihood of participating when handsets are used. → Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson 2008

Evidence

Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson 2008

Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson. (2008). 'Pretty Lights' and Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.012

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Correlational analysis of main questionnaire responses linking usefulness ratings to stated participation likelihood. Percentages are descriptive; no effect size is printed, so impact is null.

"Data analysis shows 71% of students who said they are 'neutral' as well as 57% of those who rated handset usefulness as either 'Not at all useful' or 'Not very useful' indicated that there is at least a 50% likelihood that these same students will participate in a class due to handset use"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.