Claims

88% of engineering students consider EVS appropriate for teaching Mathematics despite the difficulty of writing suitable questions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 88% of students indicated EVS are 'appropriate' for teaching Mathematics. → Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson 2008

Evidence

Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson 2008

Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson. (2008). 'Pretty Lights' and Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.012

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Main questionnaire item on appropriateness of handsets for Mathematics, answered by the 145-student cohort. Descriptive percentage only; no effect size is printed, so impact is null.

"However, the overwhelmingly positive response – 88% of students indicated that they consider EVS 'appropriate' for teaching Mathematics in response to a main questionnaire item – seems a clear verdict that students welcome the use of handsets to teach Mathematics"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.