Claims

Perceived handset drawbacks (unreliability, setup time) did not substantially alter students' positive perceptions of handset usefulness

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 83% of students citing setup time and 83% of those citing handset failures still found handsets useful or very useful. → Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson 2008

Evidence

Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson 2008

Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson. (2008). 'Pretty Lights' and Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.012

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Correlational analysis of main questionnaire responses cross-tabulating reported drawbacks against usefulness ratings. Percentages are descriptive; no effect size is printed, so impact is null.

"The results show that 35 students or 83% o f those 42 students who said handset s "take time to set up" also said that they are 'useful or very useful", while 65 students or 83% of those 78 students who complained that handsets sometimes 'don't work' also said they found handsets 'useful or very useful'"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.