Claims

Around 80% of engineering students found EVS handsets useful or very useful for their Mathematics learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 80.7% of surveyed students said handsets were 'useful' or 'very useful', with only 4.8% finding them not useful. → Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson 2008

Evidence

Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson 2008

Samuel O. King and Carol Robinson. (2008). 'Pretty Lights' and Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Mathematics Education Centre, Loughborough University. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.012

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Main 13-item questionnaire completed by 145 second-year Engineering students (58% of the class) taught Mathematics with handsets. Descriptive percentages only; no effect size is printed, so impact is null. "80.7% or 4 out of 5 students found the handsets generally useful".

"In response to a question on how useful students found the handsets, 57.9% of students said they found handsets 'useful' while 22.8% found them 'very useful'. So 80.7% or 4 out of 5 students found the handsets generally useful"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.