The experimental group showed a significant pretest-to-posttest gain in writing scores¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group's writing scores rose significantly from pretest (M=9.09) to posttest (M=13.68). → Shabani 2018
Evidence¶
Shabani 2018¶
Karim Shabani. (2018). Group Dynamic Assessment of L2 Learners' Writing Abilities. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 6(1), 129-149. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1165517
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Paired samples t-test on the experimental group's (N=22) pretest and posttest writing scores after the 12-week G-DA enrichment program; the article reports t (43) = -9.29, p = 0.000, with no effect size printed.
"Based on Tables 6 and 7, a significant difference was observed between the pretest (M=9.09) and posttest scores (M=13.68) of the experimental group (M= -4.59, SD=2.31), t (43) = -9.29, p = 0.000."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- G-DA instruction improved L2 writing performance: the experimental group outperformed the control group on the posttest — related
- Within the experimental group, self-efficacy rose significantly from pretest to posttest and follow-up, with no significant drop from posttest to follow-up — related
- The control group also made statistically significant pretest-to-posttest gains in speaking and writing, so improvement was not exclusive to the short-stories treatment — related
- The experimental group's grammar scores rose significantly from pretest to posttest under TBLT — related
- Experimental-group students taught through short stories made statistically significant gains in both speaking and writing achievement from pretest to posttest — a broader claim this one bears on
- The experimental group's collocation scores improved significantly from pretest to posttest after corpus-based instruction — related
- Task-based language teaching with pre-writing planning significantly improved Iranian EFL learners' correct use of resumptive pronouns in writing from pretest to posttest — related
- The control group's grammar scores also rose significantly from pretest to posttest under traditional instruction — related
- Both the SMS and control groups improved significantly from pretest to posttest in the programming course — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.