Claims

The experimental group showed a significant pretest-to-posttest gain in writing scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's writing scores rose significantly from pretest (M=9.09) to posttest (M=13.68). → Shabani 2018

Evidence

Shabani 2018

Karim Shabani. (2018). Group Dynamic Assessment of L2 Learners' Writing Abilities. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 6(1), 129-149. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1165517

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired samples t-test on the experimental group's (N=22) pretest and posttest writing scores after the 12-week G-DA enrichment program; the article reports t (43) = -9.29, p = 0.000, with no effect size printed.

"Based on Tables 6 and 7, a significant difference was observed between the pretest (M=9.09) and posttest scores (M=13.68) of the experimental group (M= -4.59, SD=2.31), t (43) = -9.29, p = 0.000."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.