Claims

The experimental group improved its vocabulary scores significantly from pre-test to post-test under CALL instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's vocabulary performance improved significantly between pre-test and post-test. → Enayati and Gilakjani 2020

Evidence

Enayati and Gilakjani 2020

Fatemeh Enayati, & Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani. (2020). The Impact of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Improving Intermediate EFL Learners' Vocabulary Learning. International Journal of Language Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.10560

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group comparison of the experimental group's performance at pre-test and post-test stages, which the authors report was compared through applying t-test; the article states the group "improved their vocabulary significantly through CALL instruction". No effect size is printed.

"The findings of this study showed that the experimental group improved their vocabulary significantly through CALL instruction."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.