Claims

Experimental group showed significant pre-to-post gains on vocabulary test score

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The experimental group's vocabulary test scores improved significantly from pre-test to post-test (η² = 0.548). → Ismaiel 2017

Evidence

Ismaiel 2017

Ismaiel, N. M., & Al Asmari, A. A. (2017). The Effectiveness of a programme-based Vocabulary Learning Strategies for Developing English Vocabulary for EFL Female Students at Taif University. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(3), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.3p.113

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Paired t-test for the 55 experimental-group students showed vocabulary test scores rose from pre-test (M=20.418) to post-test (M=30.182), with η²=0.548.

"significant differences between the mean scores of the pre- (M= 20.418, SD= 6.646) and post–test (M=30.182, SD= 5.214), p=0.000, t= 54, η2= 548 in favor of the post- test."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.