Claims

Experimental group scored higher than control group on post-test critical thinking at .05 significance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Grade 9 students taught with the learning management model obtained higher post-test critical thinking scores than control students taught by the customary approach, significant at the .05 level. → Chaipichit et al. 2015

Evidence

Chaipichit et al. 2015

Dudduan Chaipichit, Nirat Jantharajit and Sumalee Chookhampaeng. (2015). Development of learning management model based on constructivist theory and reasoning strategies for enhancing the critical thinking of secondary students. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2193

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Cluster-randomized comparison of two grade 9 classrooms: the experimental group (n = 33) taught with the developed model and the control group (n = 30) taught customary instruction. The experimental group's post-test mean was 46.48 versus 34.43 for the control group, with t = 9.418, p = .000.

"According to Table 2 and Figure 3, the experimental group had a higher mean score on the post-test than the control group at .05 level of significance."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.