Claims

External reminders dramatically reduce forgetting of delayed intentions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants using their own memory forgot about 45% of intentions versus around 5% using external reminders, an almost order-of-magnitude reduction. → Gilbert 2023

Evidence

Gilbert 2023

Gilbert, S. J., Boldt, A., Sachdeva, C., Scarampi, C., & Tsai, P.-C. (2023). Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of 'Intention Offloading'. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, citing the optimal reminders experiments of Gilbert et al. (2020), that 'using reminders reduced the forgetting rate by almost an order of magnitude', citing Jones et al. (2021) as further support. No effect size is printed.

"participants in Gilbert et al. (2020) had a forgetting rate of about 45% when using their own memory but only around 5% using external reminders; in other words, using reminders reduced the forgetting rate by almost an order of magnitude"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id external-reminders-reduce-forgetting
title External reminders dramatically reduce forgetting of delayed intentions
description External reminders dramatically reduce forgetting of delayed intentions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gilbert-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.