Claims

Effort avoidance contributes to reminder overuse beyond metacognitive error

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Financial incentives for performance significantly reduced, but did not eliminate, the bias towards external reminders. → Gilbert 2023

Evidence

Gilbert 2023

Gilbert, S. J., Boldt, A., Sachdeva, C., Scarampi, C., & Tsai, P.-C. (2023). Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of 'Intention Offloading'. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02139-4

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports Sachdeva and Gilbert (2020), who argued that reward-sensitivity of the reminder bias is diagnostic of effort avoidance rather than metacognitive error alone. No effect size is printed.

"the bias towards external reminders was significantly reduced, but not eliminated, when participants received a financial reward for their performance of the task"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id effort-avoidance-reminder-bias
title Effort avoidance contributes to reminder overuse beyond metacognitive error
description Effort avoidance contributes to reminder overuse beyond metacognitive error
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gilbert-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.