Claims

Negative Facebook effects on lower achievers hold for both university-study and non-study uses across the least difficult learning levels

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Relative time spent on a range of reasons for using Facebook, whether university study related or not, has negative implications for lower academic achievers across the least difficult learning levels. → James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley 2020

Evidence

James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley 2020

James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley. (2020). How does students’ general academic achievement moderate the implications of social networking on specific levels of learning performance? Computers & Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519302477?via%3Dihub

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Regressions proxying reason-specific Facebook time by multiplying daily Facebook minutes by Likert extent/likelihood ratings. Study-related uses (e.g. "Ask a classmate for help in the class") showed significant negative coefficients for low WAM students (e.g. "–0.181***").

"The relative time spent on a range of reasons for using Facebook has clear implications on student performance, for lower academic achievers, regardless of whether these uses are university study or non -study related ."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.