Claims

Facebook-use effects on general academic achievement (WAM) are insignificant, indicating findings are unique to the introductory accounting context

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In sensitivity testing using WAM as the dependent variable, the implications of Facebook time and Facebook uses on WAM are insignificant in all cases. → James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley 2020

Evidence

James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley 2020

James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley. (2020). How does students’ general academic achievement moderate the implications of social networking on specific levels of learning performance? Computers & Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519302477?via%3Dihub

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Sensitivity testing re-ran the regression model with WAM as the dependent variable and final examination grade as a control, splitting the sample at the median accounting grade. The article reports the Facebook effects on WAM were "insignificant in all cases".

"The regression results indicate the implications of student time spent on Facebook and associated Facebook uses on WAM is insignificant in all cases. This sensitivity testing indicates our findings are unique to the introductory accounting context"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.