Claims

Lower academic achievers (low WAM) drive the negative Facebook effect, with significant negative coefficients on the least difficult exam sections

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the low WAM sub-sample, Facebook time coefficients are negative and significant for decision making (–0.164), cost volume profit (–0.183) and financial accounting (–0.145) sections. → James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley 2020

Evidence

James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley 2020

James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley. (2020). How does students’ general academic achievement moderate the implications of social networking on specific levels of learning performance? Computers & Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519302477?via%3Dihub

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Sub-sample OLS regressions splitting 505 respondents at the median WAM (low WAM n = 247). Low-WAM Facebook time coefficients were significant: "–0.164" (decision making), "–0.183" (cost volume profit), "–0.145**" (financial accounting).

"Of particular concern is students who are generally lower academic achievers, our low WAM sub-sample, drive this result, indicating these students are the ones who are specifically negatively impacted by the disruptive nature of Facebook"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.