Claims

Time spent on LinkedIn, Snapchat and Twitter has virtually no significant impact on student performance at any learning level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across the full sample, low and high WAM sub-samples and all five performance variables, time on LinkedIn, Snapchat and Twitter shows virtually no significant impact on performance. → James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley 2020

Evidence

James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley 2020

James Wakefield & Jessica K. Frawley. (2020). How does students’ general academic achievement moderate the implications of social networking on specific levels of learning performance? Computers & Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131519302477?via%3Dihub

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Further testing measured weekly time on LinkedIn, Snapchat and Twitter via survey question 4 and re-ran the regressions; the article reports "virtually no significant impact on student p erformance of any kind", highlighting the impactful nature of Facebook time.

"Our results across the full sample, low and high general academic achievement sub-samples and the five levels of specific learning performance variables, indicate time spent on LinkedIn, Snapchat and Twitter has virtually no significant impact on student p erformance of any kind ."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.