For postdiction bias on factual questions, underestimation was prevalent for females, higher reading skill, and lower self-perceived topic knowledge and metacomprehension ability¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? For postdiction bias on factual questions, underestimation was prevalent for females, higher reading skill, lower self-perceived topic knowledge, and lower self-perceived metacomprehension ability, while males and participants with lower reading skill and higher self-perceptions hardly overestimated anymore. → Stefanie Golke 2022
Evidence¶
Stefanie Golke 2022¶
Stefanie Golke, Tim Steininger, & Jörg Wittwer. (2022). What Makes Learners Overestimate Their Text Comprehension? The Impact of Learner Characteristics on Judgment Bias. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09687-0
q3 · i? · associational · r2
For the postdiction bias of factual questions, which slightly tended toward underestimation at group level, Figure 1 showed "underestimation was prevalent for females, higher reading skill, lower self-perceived topic knowledge, and lower self-perceived metacomprehension ability."
"underestimation was prevalent for females, higher reading skill, lower self-perceived topic knowledge, and lower self-perceived metacomprehension ability"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Reading and Language — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Effects of gender and self-perceived metacomprehension ability on bias arose mainly from judgment magnitude, whereas WMC and topic knowledge also affected performance — related
- For prediction judgments on factual questions, males and learners with lower WMC and lower topic knowledge, but higher self-perceived topic knowledge and self-perceived metacomprehension ability, showed stronger overestimation — related
- For inference questions, lower reading skill, higher self-efficacy, and higher self-reported monitoring strategies were associated with stronger overestimation, with openness associated only for predictions — related
- Significant learner characteristics explained 17% and 14% of variance in prediction bias and 11% and 12% in postdiction bias, so characteristics were slightly more relevant for predictions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
factual-postdiction-underestimation-pattern |
title |
For postdiction bias on factual questions, underestimation was prevalent for females, higher reading skill, and lower self-perceived topic knowledge and metacomprehension ability |
description |
For postdiction bias on factual questions, underestimation was prevalent for females, higher reading skill, and lower self-perceived topic knowledge and metacomprehension ability |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — stefanie-golke-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.