Claims

Feedback is the TST component most frequently omitted from freely available online videos, with no video demonstrating feedback provision

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? None of the ten videos demonstrated the provision of feedback to promote motor learning and only one provided instruction on how to provide feedback. → Towersey Nicola C.M. 2024

Evidence

Towersey Nicola C.M. 2024

Towersey Nicola C.M., Sasse Kelvin, Stavric Verna, Alder Gemma, Saywell Nicola L. (2024). Freely available, online videos to support neurological physiotherapists and students in task-specific training skill acquisition: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05545-5

q2 · i? · review · r2

Component-level content analysis of the ten included videos (Table 4, feedback row): the article reports no video demonstrated feedback provision and only one gave instruction on it, which the authors call concerning as feedback is essential for motor learning.

"None of the videos demonstrated the provision of feedback to promote motor learning and only one video provided instruction on how to provide feedback."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.