Changes were detected more easily on screens presenting fewer objects (66.66%)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Eight participants (66.66%) more easily detected the change on the screen where there were fewer objects. → Mutlu-Bayraktar 2018

Evidence¶

Mutlu-Bayraktar 2018¶

Mutlu-Bayraktar, D. & Bayram, S. (2018). Effects of cueing and signaling on change blindness in multimedia learning environment. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(1), 128–139. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1205386

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive eye-tracking finding from the multimedia animation study: on the scene with fewer objects, 8 of 12 participants (66.66%) detected the change, and eye movements showed participants could focus on the change more easily there.

"Eight participants (6 6.66%) more easily managed to detect the change in the screen where there were fewer objects (See Table 1)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Among two objects with the same signalling, participants focused more on the arrow-cued object, and the change occurred in the un-cued object — related
• In a multimedia animation, participants focused more on signalled objects and detected fewer changes in other screen areas — related
• Change in the most-focused central object was detected at a low rate (41.66%) unless it was signalled and cued — related
• The change on the object being verbally described was the most detected change, seen by 10 of 12 participants (83.33%) — related
• In a change detection task, adults outperform 4-to-5-year-olds on cued shapes while children outperform adults on uncued shapes — related