The change on the object being verbally described was the most detected change, seen by 10 of 12 participants (83.33%)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The change occurring on the object being verbally described was detected by 10 of 12 participants (83.33%), the highest detection rate in the study. → Mutlu-Bayraktar 2018
Evidence¶
Mutlu-Bayraktar 2018¶
Mutlu-Bayraktar, D. & Bayram, S. (2018). Effects of cueing and signaling on change blindness in multimedia learning environment. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(1), 128–139. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1205386
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive eye-tracking findings from the multimedia animation study: in the signalled-object scene, 10 of 12 participants (83.33%) detected the change, and participants "easily detected changes on the objects that were verbally described and signalled".
"It was found that the most detected change was on the object being verbally described and 10 participants out of 12 (83.33%) were found to detect the change (See Table 1)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
-
Relevancy of emphasized text directs attention and influences test performance — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Clear Structure Improves Learning — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Change in the most-focused central object was detected at a low rate (41.66%) unless it was signalled and cued — related
- Among two objects with the same signalling, participants focused more on the arrow-cued object, and the change occurred in the un-cued object — related
- Changes were detected more easily on screens presenting fewer objects (66.66%) — related
- In a multimedia animation, participants focused more on signalled objects and detected fewer changes in other screen areas — related
- Signaling Improves Learning — a broader claim this one bears on
- A narrative review reports that the signaling studies it cites found higher learning outcomes with signaled multimedia (illustrations with labeled text) than without — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
signalled-and-cued-object-change-most-detected |
title |
The change on the object being verbally described was the most detected change, seen by 10 of 12 participants (83.33%) |
description |
The change on the object being verbally described was the most detected change, seen by 10 of 12 participants (83.33%) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mutlu-bayraktar-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.