Claims

Conversation/discussion (62%) and brainstorming (61%) were the most frequent teaching techniques in the program

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Frequency analysis of journal notes showed conversation/discussion occurred in 62% and brainstorming in 61% of coded teaching and learning points, ahead of group learning (57%), role-plays (51%), cognitive conflict (47%) and concept maps (34%). → Papadopoulos 2020

Evidence

Papadopoulos 2020

Papadopoulos, I., & Bisiri, E. (2020). Fostering Critical Thinking Skills in Preschool Education: Designing, Implementing and Assessing a Multiliteracies-Oriented Program Based on Intercultural Tales. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 8(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.46886/MAJESS/v8-i1/7263

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive frequency analysis of the researchers' journal notes across the program's teaching sessions, reported in Table 2. The quoted percentages are the article's own printed frequencies of occurrence for each teaching technique or strategy.

"The teacher made more use of conversation/discussion (62%) and brainstorming strategies (61%) as it is revealed from the investigation of frequency of occurrence of each strategy."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id folktale-program-technique-frequencies-discussion-brainstorming
title Conversation/discussion (62%) and brainstorming (61%) were the most frequent teaching techniques in the program
description Conversation/discussion (62%) and brainstorming (61%) were the most frequent teaching techniques in the program
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2020
recheck_by 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — papadopoulos-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.