Claims

Preschoolers in a multiliteracies folk-tale program showed increased critical-thinking behaviors in qualitative journal data

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Through qualitative analysis of researcher journals, children in the program appeared to acquire ways of dealing with familiar issues and to identify gaps in problematic situations, generating critical thinking skills. → Papadopoulos 2020

Evidence

Papadopoulos 2020

Papadopoulos, I., & Bisiri, E. (2020). Fostering Critical Thinking Skills in Preschool Education: Designing, Implementing and Assessing a Multiliteracies-Oriented Program Based on Intercultural Tales. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 8(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.46886/MAJESS/v8-i1/7263

q2 · i? · design · r2

Qualitative analysis of teacher/researcher journals kept in every session of the seven-month program with 25 Greek preschoolers. The researchers report children seemed to be "acquiring an understanding of the ways to be used for dealing with familiar issues" and trying to identify gaps in problematic situations.

"The children appeared to be trying to identify gaps in “problemat ic” situations and generate their skills of critical thinking."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id preschool-folktale-program-increased-critical-thinking-qualitative
title Preschoolers in a multiliteracies folk-tale program showed increased critical-thinking behaviors in qualitative journal data
description Preschoolers in a multiliteracies folk-tale program showed increased critical-thinking behaviors in qualitative journal data
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2020
source_checked 2026-10-18
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — papadopoulos-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.