Claims

Cooperative learning produced significantly higher posttest listening scores than traditional teaching in this study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After one semester, the experiment class (CL) scored significantly higher than the control class on the CET-4-based listening posttest (p<0.01). → Min Han 2015

Evidence

Min Han 2015

Min Han. (2015). An Empirical Study on the Application of Cooperative Learning to English Listening Classes. English Language Teaching, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n3p177

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent-samples t-test on posttest scores of two intact classes (CG N=53, mean 59.09; EG N=52, mean 64.54) after a semester in which the experiment class received CL for two hours weekly. The article reports "the significant level is 0.000". No effect size is printed.

"In the posttest, the mean score in the experiment class is much higher than that of control class. As the significant level is 0.000, that is p<0.01, we can say in this research, CL is very effective and brings significant results to students’ listening competence"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.