Claims

The revised, unified First Step Next retains the efficacy of the original program in preschool settings, though parent-reported effects remain small

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Standardizing the preschool and early elementary components into a unified program and adding Super Student Skills did not reduce effect sizes relative to previous studies. → Feil 2020

Evidence

Feil 2020

Feil, E. G., Walker, H. M., Frey, A. J., Seeley, J. R., Small, J. W., Golly, A., Lee, J., & Forness, S. R. (2020). Efficacy Validation of the Revised First Step Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Exceptional Children. https://journals.sagepub.com/home/ecx

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretation comparing this RCT's effect sizes with prior First Step RCTs (e.g., Feil et al., 2014, where teacher-measure effect sizes ranged approximately 0.7 to 0.9 and parent measures 0.3 to 0.4). This is an interpretive claim, not a direct statistical comparison within the study.

"this study adds to its accumulated literature base by providing empirical support that the revised program, which unified the preschool and elementary versions and streamlined components to improve usability and satisfaction, retains its effectiveness in the preschool population"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.