Claims

First Step Next replication RCTs produced small to large effect sizes and statistically significant behavioral gains compared with control conditions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across five replication RCTs, FSN produced small to large effect sizes, positive improvement indices, and statistically significant gains on prosocial and problem behavior versus randomized controls. → Andy J. Frey 2023

Evidence

Andy J. Frey 2023

Andy J. Frey, Jason W. Small, Hill M. Walker, Brandon Mitchell, John R. Seeley, Edward G. Feil, Jon Lee, and Steven R. Forness. (2023). First Step Next: A Best-Evidence Synthesis of Replication Randomized Controlled Trials From 2009 to 2021. Remedial and Special Education, 44(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211068145

q3 · i? · review · r2

Best-evidence synthesis of five replication RCTs of First Step Next (N = 200, 286, 379, 126, 160) plus four subsample analyses. The review reports "small to large ESs" and "statistically significant behavioral gains" relative to randomized control conditions; no pooled effect size is printed.

"The best-evidence synthesis, along with subsample analyses, resulted in small to large ESs, very positive improvement indices, and statistically significant behavioral gains compared with students randomized to control conditions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.