Claims

FSN's impact was more robust in the school setting than in the home setting across all five RCTs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Teacher-reported outcomes showed medium to large effects across studies while parent-reported prosocial measures generated small effects in all studies except Walker et al. (2009). → Andy J. Frey 2023

Evidence

Andy J. Frey 2023

Andy J. Frey, Jason W. Small, Hill M. Walker, Brandon Mitchell, John R. Seeley, Edward G. Feil, Jon Lee, and Steven R. Forness. (2023). First Step Next: A Best-Evidence Synthesis of Replication Randomized Controlled Trials From 2009 to 2021. Remedial and Special Education, 44(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211068145

q3 · i? · review · r2

Cross-study comparison in the synthesis discussion of teacher versus parent SSiS reports across all five RCTs. The review reports "teacher reports of prosocial behavior were in the medium to large range across studies" while parent-reported prosocial measures were small except in one study.

"In each of the five RCTs, the impact of the FSN intervention was more robust in the school than in the home setting, as indicated by teacher versus parent reports on the SSiS measures."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.