GAA-LS scores correlate positively with feedback engagement, academic integrity intention, and responsible AI use intention, and differ across known groups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 The GAA-LS total score correlated with feedback engagement (r = .60), academic integrity intention (r = .51), and responsible AI use intention (r = .59), all p < .001. → Nie J 2026
Evidence¶
Nie J 2026¶
Nie J, Zhang Z, Lu X, Zhang Y and Zhang M (2026) Development and validation of the generative AI assessment literacy scale for higher education students: psychometric evidence and associations with feedback engagement and academic integrity. Front. Educ. 11:1934632. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1934632
q3 · i3 · associational · r2
Study 2 criterion-related validity correlations. The subscale pattern was theoretically coherent: "feedback uptake and revision literacy showed the strongest association with feedback engagement" (r = .58) and ethical attribution showed the strongest association with academic integrity intention (r = .55).
"The GAA-LS total score correlated with feedback engagement (r = .60, p < .001), academic integrity intention (r = .51, p < .001), and responsible AI use intention (r = .59, p < .001)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Feedback engagement indirectly associates GAA-LS scores with academic integrity intention in a cross-sectional structural model — related
- The GAA-LS shows satisfactory-to-strong internal consistency and evidence of convergent and discriminant validity — related
- Confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample supports the five-factor correlated model over collapsed and one-factor alternatives — related
- Exploratory factor analysis supports a five-factor GAA-LS structure explaining 67.82% of variance — related
- All SFAILQ dimensions correlate positively with academic self-efficacy (usage skills strongest) and academic engagement (responsible use strongest) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
gaa-ls-criterion-known-group-validity |
title |
GAA-LS scores correlate positively with feedback engagement, academic integrity intention, and responsible AI use intention, and differ across known groups |
description |
GAA-LS scores correlate positively with feedback engagement, academic integrity intention, and responsible AI use intention, and differ across known groups |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nie-j-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.