Claims

Feedback engagement indirectly associates GAA-LS scores with academic integrity intention in a cross-sectional structural model

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the structural model, GAA-LS scores were positively associated with feedback engagement (β = .56), which was positively associated with academic integrity intention (β = .37), with a significant indirect association (β = .21, 95% CI [.15, .28]). → Nie J 2026

Evidence

Nie J 2026

Nie J, Zhang Z, Lu X, Zhang Y and Zhang M (2026) Development and validation of the generative AI assessment literacy scale for higher education students: psychometric evidence and associations with feedback engagement and academic integrity. Front. Educ. 11:1934632. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1934632

q3 · i? · design · r3

Study 2 structural equation model with 798 students, fit χ2(218) = 498.35, CFI = .955, RMSEA = .040; indirect effects estimated with 5,000 bootstrap samples. The model accounted for 31% of variance in feedback engagement and 36% in academic integrity intention.

"Bootstrapping results further indicated a significant indirect association of GAA-LS scores with academic integrity intention through feedback engagement (β = .21, 95% CI [.15, .28]). The total effect was also significant (β = .45, 95% CI [.37, .53])."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gaa-ls-feedback-engagement-indirect-association
title Feedback engagement indirectly associates GAA-LS scores with academic integrity intention in a cross-sectional structural model
description Feedback engagement indirectly associates GAA-LS scores with academic integrity intention in a cross-sectional structural model
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nie-j-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.