Claims

Gender is associated with healthcare leaders' digital competence, with females' computer and patient monitoring system knowledge lower than males'

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the reviewed quantitative studies, females' computer knowledge was lower than that of males and males' ICT ability was higher than females'. → Laakkonen Noora 2024

Evidence

Laakkonen Noora 2024

Laakkonen Noora, Jarva Erika, Hammarén Mira, Kanste Outi, Kääriäinen Maria, Oikarinen Anne, Mikkonen Kristina. (2024). Digital Competence among Healthcare Leaders: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. Journal of Nursing Management. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8435248

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis of cross-sectional studies included in the review; the Adatara et al. study found gender differences in ICT use. The review reports "females' computer knowledge was lower than that of males" and "males' ICT ability was higher than females".

"It was evident that females' computer knowledge was lower than that of males, and the proportion of females not knowing how to use computerised patient monitoring systems was higher than that of males. Therefore, males' ICT ability was higher than females [43]."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.