Integrating governance criteria and regulatory frameworks into CA-supported LO assessment enhanced decision-making effectiveness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-09 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Integration of governance criteria and regulatory frameworks into the LO assessment process enhanced decision-making effectiveness, with the CA tool providing structured evidence for informed continuous improvement decisions. → Mónica Hernández-Campos 2026
Evidence¶
Mónica Hernández-Campos 2026¶
Mónica Hernández-Campos, Isabel Hilliger and Francisco José García-Peñalvo. (2026). Assessing 21st Century Competencies: A Two-Case Study on Curriculum Analytics to Inform Continuous Improvement in Higher Education. Journal of Learning Analytics 13(1). https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9131
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Cross-case qualitative finding (RQ2-2) from improvement-plan documents, interviews, and cognitive walkthroughs, with n = 12 extracts (30%) at U1 and n = 28 (70%) at U2. Accreditation documents indicate the administrative structure incorporates outcome analysis.
"The integration of governance criteria and regulatory frameworks into the LO assessment process enhanced decision-making effectiveness."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- CA data visualization positioned LO attainment data as the central axis of curriculum decision-making in both institutions — related
- CA tool-based assessment and visualization of learning outcomes enables targeted feedback and evidence-based adjustment of pedagogical practices in higher education — related
- Active participation and commitment of teaching staff were essential for successful CA-supported LO assessment, fostered by clear actionable data and institutional support — related
- Clear role assignment, training resources, and advisory support facilitated CA-supported continuous improvement and reduced faculty workload perceptions — related
- A literature review identifies misalignment between conducted research and needed evidence, contextual factors, and rarely used bridging frameworks as challenges to evidence use in policy decisions — a broader claim this one bears on
- Subject matter interviews reveal barriers to evidence use in government: untimely evidence, research not geared to decision-makers, limited understanding of evidence, and organizational influences — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
governance-integration-enhances-ca-decision-making |
title |
Integrating governance criteria and regulatory frameworks into CA-supported LO assessment enhanced decision-making effectiveness |
description |
Integrating governance criteria and regulatory frameworks into CA-supported LO assessment enhanced decision-making effectiveness |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-09 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mónica-hernández-campos-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.