Claims

Effect sizes across studies show substantial heterogeneity, with wide prediction intervals spanning large negative to large positive true effects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The Q-statistic was significant and I-squared was 83.78% in the model with outliers, indicating most observed variance reflects true heterogeneity. → Ellinor Waaland 2026 q3 i? The 95% prediction interval ranged from -0.96 to 1.90, indicating future true effects could range from large negative to large positive. → Ellinor Waaland 2026

Evidence

Ellinor Waaland 2026

Ellinor Waaland, Vibeke Rønneberg, Dieuwer ten Braak. (2026). Effects and Characteristics of Mathematics Interventions for Students with Co-Occurring Difficulties in Mathematics and Reading: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10184-x

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Heterogeneity assessment in the CHE meta-analysis of 60 effect sizes nested in nine studies. The Q-test was significant; the article reports "The I-squared value of 83.78 indicates that 83.78% of the variance in observed effects between effect sizes within studies reflects true heterogeneity" and a prediction interval from -0.96 to 1.90.

"The Q-statistic for the test of heterogeneity in effect sizes across studies was significant (Q (59) = 1015.47, p < 0.001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id heterogeneity-math-interventions-co-occurring
title Effect sizes across studies show substantial heterogeneity, with wide prediction intervals spanning large negative to large positive true effects
description Effect sizes across studies show substantial heterogeneity, with wide prediction intervals spanning large negative to large positive true effects
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ellinor-waaland-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.