Claims

Effects of game-based learning in STEM education vary substantially across studies, with prediction intervals spanning trivial-to-negative through very strong effects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Between-study heterogeneity is large (I2 76%-92%) and true effects disperse widely around the mean, including negative effects in some populations. → Michaela Arztmann 2023

Evidence

Michaela Arztmann 2023

Michaela Arztmann, Lisette Hornstra, Johan Jeuring & Liesbeth Kester (2023). Effects of games in STEM education: a meta-analysis on the moderating role of student background characteristics. Studies in Science Education, 59:1, 109-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2022.2057732

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Random-effects meta-analysis reporting heterogeneity statistics: I2 ranges from 76% to 92% across the three outcomes, and the article states "the dispersion of effects around this mean is substantial", with prediction intervals of −0.11 to +1.12 for motivation and +0.08 to +1.78 for behaviour.

"For cognition, the 95% prediction interval ranges from −0.38 to +1.76. This means, that in the population represented by the included studies, the true effect size in 95% of cases will fall somewhere in this range"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id games-stem-substantial-heterogeneity-prediction-intervals
title Effects of game-based learning in STEM education vary substantially across studies, with prediction intervals spanning trivial-to-negative through very strong effects
description Effects of game-based learning in STEM education vary substantially across studies, with prediction intervals spanning trivial-to-negative through very strong effects
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — michaela-arztmann-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.