Claims

Effect sizes vary widely between studies and especially between comparisons within studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Large heterogeneity was observed in intervention effect sizes, especially between comparisons within studies. → Verhoeven 2022

Evidence

Verhoeven 2022

Verhoeven, L.T.W.; Voeten, M.J.M.; Segers, P.C.J. (2022). Computer-assisted word reading intervention effects throughout the primary grades: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, article 100486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100486

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Heterogeneity observation from the multilevel meta-analysis of 694 effect sizes across 67 studies; the review reports "Large variation in effect sizes was observed between studies and especially between comparisons within studies". No heterogeneity statistic is printed in the available text.

"Large variation in effect sizes was observed between studies and especially between comparisons within studies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id large-variation-word-reading-intervention-effects
title Effect sizes vary widely between studies and especially between comparisons within studies
description Effect sizes vary widely between studies and especially between comparisons within studies
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — verhoeven-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.