High CPS groups have higher and more similar member mean physical interactivity scores than low CPS groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Groups rated high CPS had higher mean interactivity scores and much smaller total squared differences between members (e.g. 0.02 for Univ. J vs 0.76 for Univ. B). → Cukurova 2017

Evidence¶

Cukurova 2017¶

Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E., & Mavrikis, M. (2017). The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students' physical interactions. Preprint submitted to Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.007

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Observational analysis of mean activity codes per student (Table 4). High CPS group J's member means were 1.75, 1.81 and 1.68 with total squared differences of 0.02; the article states the difference for group B is "approximately forty times bigger" than in group J. No effect size is printed.

"the mean physical interactivity scores for member students of U-Group B, which was coded as one of the low CPS groups, were 1.07,1.12, and 1.71, and the average of the differences between the three students' physical interactivity was 0.76."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High CPS groups show lower intra-individual variability of physical interactivity than low CPS groups — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Individual accountability measured via the NISPI coding scheme alone is less valuable for predicting CPS competence, with high index values in groups not rated high — related
• Groups judged high in CPS competence by human observers show higher percentages of active synchrony (222 states) than low-competence groups in practice-based learning