Individual accountability measured via the NISPI coding scheme alone is less valuable for predicting CPS competence, with high index values in groups not rated high¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? High CPS groups showed high individual accountability percentages, but groups Univ. A and Univ. G, not rated high, also showed high values (64.71% and 47.83%). → Cukurova 2017

Evidence¶

Cukurova 2017¶

Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E., & Mavrikis, M. (2017). The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students' physical interactions. Preprint submitted to Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.007

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Observational analysis of coded group interactions (Table 3 percentages). High CPS groups showed values such as 42.86% and 53.46%, but "their individual accountability value measured in calculations are quite high" for two non-high groups, so the index does not align cleanly with observer ratings. No effect size is printed.

"for groups Univ. A and Univ. G, even though were not considered as a high CPS group by human observers, their individual accountability value measured in calculations are quite high with the respective values of 64.71% and 47.83%."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High CPS groups have higher and more similar member mean physical interactivity scores than low CPS groups — related
• Groups judged high in CPS competence by human observers show higher percentages of active synchrony (222 states) than low-competence groups in practice-based learning — related
• Synchrony, equality and intra-individual variability are good predictors of CPS competence, while individual accountability measured alone is less valuable — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• High CPS groups show lower intra-individual variability of physical interactivity than low CPS groups