High CPS groups show lower intra-individual variability of physical interactivity than low CPS groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? High CPS groups had low total squared differences of IV scores (Univ. D=0.00, Univ. F=0.05, Univ. J=0.01, Hsch.X=0.06) whereas low collaboration groups had the highest figures (Univ. B=0.16, Univ. K=0.55, HSch. Z=1.49). → Cukurova 2017

Evidence¶

Cukurova 2017¶

Cukurova, M., Luckin, R., Millán, E., & Mavrikis, M. (2017). The NISPI framework: Analysing collaborative problem-solving from students' physical interactions. Preprint submitted to Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.007

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Observational analysis of intra-individual variability computed from sequential 30-second activity codes (Table 5, Figure 6). The article reports "high CPS groups show lower IV values, whereas low CPS groups show higher IV values"; no effect size is printed.

"high CPS groups appear to have low values (Univ. D= 0.00, Univ. F= 0.05, Univ. J= 0.01, Hsch.X = 0.06), whereas low collaboration groups have the highest two figures (Univ. B= 0.16, Univ. K= 0.55, HSch. Z=1.49)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High CPS groups have higher and more similar member mean physical interactivity scores than low CPS groups — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Groups judged high in CPS competence by human observers show higher percentages of active synchrony (222 states) than low-competence groups in practice-based learning — related
• Synchrony, equality and intra-individual variability are good predictors of CPS competence, while individual accountability measured alone is less valuable — a broader claim this one bears on
• Individual accountability measured via the NISPI coding scheme alone is less valuable for predicting CPS competence, with high index values in groups not rated high