Holistic retrieval via free-recall improves retention of non-targeted information, but only on the free-recall posttest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Free-recall practice led to better retention of non-targeted content sections than short-answer practice on the free-recall posttest, but not on the short-answer posttest. → Tino Endres 2020
Evidence¶
Tino Endres 2020¶
Tino Endres, Lena Kranzdorf, Vivien Schneider, Alexander Renkl. (2020). It matters how to recall – task differences in retrieval practice. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09526-1
q2 · i2 · causal · r2
In the same 54-participant within-subject experiment, the holistic-retrieval advantage for non-targeted sections on the free-recall posttest (M = 2.45 vs M = 2.10) reached significance with printed effect size ƞ2 = 0.084 (small-to-medium), while the short-answer posttest showed no difference (p = 0.261).
"This effect was, however, only apparent in the free-recall posttest types (F [1, 53] = 4.841, p = 0.032, ƞ2 = 0.084). It was not revealed in the short-answer posttest types"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Targeted retrieval via specific short-answer tasks improves retention of directly targeted information more than holistic retrieval via free-recall tasks — related
- Overall posttest performance does not differ between targeted and holistic retrieval conditions — related
- Practicing retrieval of some portions of an educational text can enhance retention of related nontested portions (retrieval-induced facilitation), but not when relational encoding is disrupted — related
- Targeted retrieval via short-answer tasks improves metacognitive calibration more than holistic retrieval via free-recall — related
- Holistic retrieval increases situational interest, with better recall performance predicting greater interest, contrary to the knowledge-deprivation hypothesis — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
holistic-retrieval-improves-non-targeted-information-free-recall-posttest |
title |
Holistic retrieval via free-recall improves retention of non-targeted information, but only on the free-recall posttest |
description |
Holistic retrieval via free-recall improves retention of non-targeted information, but only on the free-recall posttest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tino-endres-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.