Targeted retrieval via short-answer tasks improves metacognitive calibration more than holistic retrieval via free-recall¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 Learners' judgment-of-learning accuracy was better after short-answer retrieval practice than after free-recall practice. → Tino Endres 2020
Evidence¶
Tino Endres 2020¶
Tino Endres, Lena Kranzdorf, Vivien Schneider, Alexander Renkl. (2020). It matters how to recall – task differences in retrieval practice. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09526-1
q2 · i3 · causal · r2
In the 54-participant within-subject study, calibration was computed as the absolute discrepancy between aggregated JOLs and actual posttest scores. Targeted retrieval produced more accurate judgments, printed effect size ƞ2 = 0.178 (large); holistic retrieval led to higher JOL ratings (ƞ2 = 0.179).
"Targeted retrieval improved the accuracy of JOLs more than holistic retrieval (short-answer posttest: F [1, 53] = 11.470, p = 0.001, ƞ2 = 0.178; free-recall posttest: F [1, 53] = 11.470, p = 0.001, ƞ2 = 0.178; overall: F [1, 53] = 11.470, p = 0.001, ƞ2 = 0.178)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Making JOLs is not a neutral act: metacognitive ratings reactively affect subsequent learning, so experiments need judgment-free conditions — related
- Drawing after learning, both from scratch and with spatial scaffolds, improves absolute monitoring accuracy (calibration) compared with a time-matched mental reactivation control condition — related
- Targeted retrieval via specific short-answer tasks improves retention of directly targeted information more than holistic retrieval via free-recall tasks — related
- Holistic retrieval via free-recall improves retention of non-targeted information, but only on the free-recall posttest — related
- Holistic retrieval via free-recall raises self-efficacy, fully mediated by performance during retrieval practice — related
- Holistic retrieval increases situational interest, with better recall performance predicting greater interest, contrary to the knowledge-deprivation hypothesis — related
- Overall posttest performance does not differ between targeted and holistic retrieval conditions — related
- Practicing retrieval of some portions of an educational text can enhance retention of related nontested portions (retrieval-induced facilitation), but not when relational encoding is disrupted — related
- Group settings and guidelines each promoted calibration accuracy and achievement in a high school biology factorial experiment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
short-answer-tasks-improve-metacognitive-calibration |
title |
Targeted retrieval via short-answer tasks improves metacognitive calibration more than holistic retrieval via free-recall |
description |
Targeted retrieval via short-answer tasks improves metacognitive calibration more than holistic retrieval via free-recall |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tino-endres-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.